[Source]

Comment 1: The “free speech vs. hate speech” mantra is unenforceable unless we clearly define what is hate speech. Lack of such definition makes the whole idea a complete nonsense. For example, hate speech is closer to discrimination based on who you are, as opposed to what you do. Criticizing people or a state for what they do is closer to justice. If I criticize the State of Israel, its leaders, and, by extension, its voters for the crime of genocide and ethnic cleansing in Palestine, is it a hate speech? How about criticizing Nazi Germany and Adolf Hitler for the crime of Holocaust? Will this be illegal, too? How about criticizing repeated violations of international law (Geneva Conventions and UN resolutions pertaining to the illegal occupation and annexation of Palestinian territories)? Will the UN be punished for issuing these resolutions? This whole topic is a manipulation of language to silence a legitimate critique of people and states who do wrong.

Comment 2: This is actually very simple, we have learned about it in grade 9 and 10. Electrical current always produces magnetic field around it and magnetic field always produces or interferes with electrical currents. Best examples are electric motors and generators. What are “induction currents”? They are created by other electrical currents that produce magnetic fields that, in turn, induce or modify electricity in another circuit. Now imagine tiny electric currents that our nerves conduct to regulate different functions of our bodies. Tiny electrochemical signals. And then imagine huge military radars that can detect a launch of ballistic missiles on another continent. Of course, this radar will interfere with our bodily functions and our health. We live in a jungle of electromagnetic fields that surround us 24/7.