[Source]

Comments:

1. No. I don’t view this guy as a “scientist”. He is a story teller, possibly a propagandist. I can speculate about what the agenda here may be but I will not waste my time on it. His views on comets and their “tails” are not what science has been telling us for decades and it does not make much sense either. The comets’ tails have always been observed as pointing away from the Sun, which indicates that they are created by the pressure of the solar wind (solar radiation), rather than the solar magnetic field. The solar magnetic field (along with increased temperature in the vicinity of the Sun) may play a role in melting some of the comet’s material (eg,. ice) that creates the visible tail – and this is consistent with the observed facts. This guy is “swimming” but he is not a very good swimmer. It may work with less educated people but not with all people. Perhaps, this is why the dumbing down education reforms were needed (that were introduced some 25-30 years ago, a “full generation of students” in the words of Juri Bezmenov). Moreover, dethroning our existing beliefs and religions is likely to be part of the efforts to establish one world religion for the purpose of one-world government and the New World Order – we hear this for at least 40 years. In conclusion, I am not sure why Redacted is wasting time and credibility by exploring these possibilities, (is it to convince potential enemies that we have the alien technology or is it to advance the NWO agenda?) As I said earlier, this is not very important. What I see as important is that Redacted is risking its reputation as an excellent source of information on story telling that is irrelevant for their stated goals. Let’s deal with information that can be verified and proven with facts, rather than with anecdotal stories.
   —
   
2. Again, all the hypotheses about anti-gravity propulsion are based on the assumption that these objects are material (meaning: have a mass). This cannot be proven yet. What if they are a form of energy void of the properties of matter, including mass and inertia? Anecdotal statements made by various “whistleblowers” and “leaked documents” hold little credibility until real and verifiable evidence is made public and scientifically confirmed. Until then, we can ask questions but we need to hold our speculations under control.