[Source]

More from Redacted:

• Why are the media SILENT about this?
• The PLANNED October 7th False Flag All Leads to This
• NO ONE IS READY FOR THIS COMING GRID COLLAPSE
• We will not budge an inch!” Denmark stands firm on Greenland despite Trump’s threat
• This is why the US Dollar is COLLAPSING in real time

Comment: European Union and NATO allies (including Canada) have just stated that they would defend Greenland from any US invasion. Putin is trying to encourage this conflict to happen. Anything to make NATO members break apart and fight with each other. If you add to this mix Turkey and its opposition to Israel/US policies in Syria, this strategy seems to be working.

Update on January 23, 2026: Greenland Tension Abates as Trump Nears Deal, by Noé Chartier, Senior Reporter, Source: The Epoch Times Weekly Debrief e-Newsletter:

Greenland Playbook

After capturing Venezuelan Leader Nicolás Maduro in a sophisticated military operation at the beginning of the month, President Trump set his focus on a different area in the hemisphere, this one controlled by NATO ally Denmark.

Trump declared that acquiring the island of Greenland was a national security imperative to mitigate threats from Russia and China and that using force would not be ruled out in doing so.

The messaging sowed consternation in NATO capitals, leading to concerns about the future of the military alliance. The gloom was amped-up in Canada by media reports that the Canadian Armed Forces had modelled a response to a hypothetical U.S. invasion of Greenland.

Facing resistance from European countries to his designs for Greenland, Trump threatened to slap new tariffs on eight of those countries, causing further turbulence.

Prime Minister Mark Carney took a stance against the threat of tariffs during a Jan. 20 speech before the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, calling instead for a collective approach to security. He also criticized unspecified “great powers” that use tariffs as “leverage” and employ “coercion” to reach their aims.

In his address the following day, Trump made his case to a global audience about why the United States needs Greenland, but he ruled out using military force.

“We probably won’t get anything unless I decide to use excessive strength and force, where we would be, frankly, unstoppable, but I won’t do that,” he said. “Now everyone’s saying, ‘Oh, good.’ That’s probably the biggest statement I made, because people thought I would use force. I don’t have to use force. I don’t want to use force. I won’t use force.”

Later that day, after a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Trump said the framework of a deal on Greenland had been agreed upon and that he would not be imposing tariffs on the eight European countries.

Trump said discussions are being held to install components of the “Golden Dome,” his plan for a new continental air defence system to defend against sophisticated aerial threats, something Ottawa has expressed an interest in participating in.

Trump said on Jan. 22 that the deal will include the United States having “total access” to Greenland, with no fee and no time limit.

Rutte said the same day that the framework discussed with Trump calls for NATO allies to step up security in the Arctic.

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen stated on Jan. 22 that her country is ready to negotiate on everything pertaining to security, investments, and the economy, but “we cannot negotiate on our sovereignty.”

After capturing Venezuelan Leader Nicolás Maduro in a sophisticated military operation at the beginning of the month, President Trump set his focus on a different area in the hemisphere, this one controlled by NATO ally Denmark.

Trump declared that acquiring the island of Greenland was a national security imperative to mitigate threats from Russia and China and that using force would not be ruled out in doing so.

The messaging sowed consternation in NATO capitals, leading to concerns about the future of the military alliance. The gloom was amped-up in Canada by media reports that the Canadian Armed Forces had modelled a response to a hypothetical U.S. invasion of Greenland.

Facing resistance from European countries to his designs for Greenland, Trump threatened to slap new tariffs on eight of those countries, causing further turbulence.

Prime Minister Mark Carney took a stance against the threat of tariffs during a Jan. 20 speech before the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, calling instead for a collective approach to security. He also criticized unspecified “great powers” that use tariffs as “leverage” and employ “coercion” to reach their aims.

In his address the following day, Trump made his case to a global audience about why the United States needs Greenland, but he ruled out using military force.

“We probably won’t get anything unless I decide to use excessive strength and force, where we would be, frankly, unstoppable, but I won’t do that,” he said. “Now everyone’s saying, ‘Oh, good.’ That’s probably the biggest statement I made, because people thought I would use force. I don’t have to use force. I don’t want to use force. I won’t use force.”

Later that day, after a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Trump said the framework of a deal on Greenland had been agreed upon and that he would not be imposing tariffs on the eight European countries.

Trump said discussions are being held to install components of the “Golden Dome,” his plan for a new continental air defence system to defend against sophisticated aerial threats, something Ottawa has expressed an interest in participating in.

Trump said on Jan. 22 that the deal will include the United States having “total access” to Greenland, with no fee and no time limit.

Rutte said the same day that the framework discussed with Trump calls for NATO allies to step up security in the Arctic.

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen stated on Jan. 22 that her country is ready to negotiate on everything pertaining to security, investments, and the economy, but “we cannot negotiate on our sovereignty.”