Image credit: engin akyurt on Unsplash
By Dr. Russell Blaylock
Technocracy 12 May 2020
Global Research, July 24, 2020
“Dr. Russell Blaylock warns that not only do face masks fail to protect the healthy from getting sick, but they also create serious health risks to the wearer. The bottom line is that if you are not sick, you should not wear a face mask.
As businesses reopen, many are requiring shoppers and employees to wear a face mask. Costco, for instance, will not allow shoppers into the store without wearing a face mask. Many employers are requiring all employees to wear a face mask while at work. In some jurisdictions, all citizens must wear a face mask if they are outside of their own home.” ⁃ TN Editor – [Source]
With the advent of the so-called COVID-19 pandemic, we have seen a number of medical practices that have little or no scientific support as regards reducing the spread of this infection. One of these measures is the wearing of facial masks, either a surgical-type mask, bandana or N95 respirator mask. When this pandemic began and we knew little about the virus itself or its epidemiologic behavior, it was assumed that it would behave, in terms of spread among communities, like other respiratory viruses. Little has presented itself after intense study of this virus and its behavior to change this perception.
Never has a pandemic or epidemic come back in waves in the middle of summer, in all Western countries at exactly the same time, simultaneously. And here we are, “the wave” is back in the US, in Canada, in Europe, and in Australia, during the same week – as if ordered and promptly executed – although travel is suspended or reduced and contacts between continents are limited. This alone causes suspicion about the pandemic. Curiously, it has come back mainly through leftist media and in areas controlled by leftist governments. It looks like a bogus script with far-reaching goals that are unrelated to health and imposed on our consciousness by fear-mongering propaganda. Unfortunately, many people do not question the “news” and willingly follow imposed on them restrictions.
Last Sunday, I went for a walk in the Dundas Valley Conservation Area. Even though it was Sunday evening and the weather was perfect, I have not seen many people. I was passing another walker on average every 20 – 30 minutes. Most of the time, there was nobody around as far as I could see. Then, I found this poster placed there by the HCA:
The question above is not a joke. Most available masks and all masks made by people at home are ineffective against viruses. Additionally, they are not healthy, they are bad for you. They cut your oxygen intake by 10 – 15%. They collect your germs that you then breath in over and over, instead of breathing fresh air. They require frequent replacement and most people wear the same mask until the mask looks like garbage. Most people wear their masks improperly, either below their noses, or leaving gaps on both sides of their noses, in which case they breath through these gaps, not through the mask. Think about it, when your glasses fog up, while you are wearing a mask. Finally, the masks are not cheap, they are rather expensive, if you were to put on a new mask every two hours. It would be interesting to know who is profiting from importing and distributing masks in Canada and in Ontario.
Senator William McMaster resting at the McMaster University grounds
By Dr Jack Rasmus
The US economy at mid-year 2020 is at a critical juncture. What happens in the next three months will likely determine whether the current Great Recession 2.0 continues to follow a W-shape trajectory—or drifts over an economic precipice into an economic depression. With prompt and sufficient fiscal stimulus targeting US households, minimal political instability before the November 2020 elections, and no financial instability event, it may be contained. No worse than a prolonged W-shape recovery will occur. But should the fiscal stimulus be minimal (and poorly composed), should political instability grow significantly worse, and a major financial instability event erupt in the US (or globally), then it is highly likely a descent to a bona fide economic depression will occur.
The prognosis for a swift economic recovery is not all that positive. Multiple forces are at work that strongly suggest the early summer economic ‘rebound’ will prove temporary and that a further decline in jobs, consumption, investment, and the economy is on the horizon.
Read the entire article here…
Comment: An important article for everyone, as it affects jobs, education, markets (including housing), health care, place of residence, holidays, travelling, etc.
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, May 19, 2020
The COV-19 vaccine is now front page news. Yet the first tests were conducted in mid-March and there was virtually no coverage.
The following article by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky was first published by Global Research on March 17, 2020, following the first tests of a vaccine conducted by Moderna Inc. with human volunteers in Seattle on March 16.
The tendency is towards a Worldwide lockdown spearheaded by fear and media disinformation. Currently, hundreds of millions of people Worldwide are under lockdown.
What is the next step in the evolution of the COV-19 Crisis?
The lead entity for the novel coronavirus vaccine initiative is the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) an organization sponsored and financed by the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Note the chronology: The development of the 2019 nCoV vaccine was announced at the Davos World Economic Forum (WEF) a week prior to the official launching by the WHO of a Worldwide Public Health Emergency (January 30) at a time when the number of “confirmed cases” Worldwide (outside China) was 150 (including 6 in the US).
The pandemic was launched by the WHO on March 11. And five days later, barely covered by the media, the first tests involving human volunteers were conducted in Seattle on March 16.
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, June 18, 2020
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist. (President Dwight D. Eisenhower, January 17, 1961)
The World is being misled concerning the causes and consequences of the corona crisis. The COVID-19 crisis is marked by a public health “emergency” under WHO auspices which is being used as a pretext and a justification to triggering a Worldwide process of economic, social and political restructuring. Social engineering is being applied. Governments are pressured into extending the lockdown, despite its devastating economic and social consequences.
What is happening is unprecedented in World history. Prominent scientists support the lockdown without batting an eyelid, as a “solution” to a global health emergency. Amply documented, the estimates of the COVID-19 infection including mortality data are grossly manipulated. In turn, people are obeying their governments. Why? Because they are afraid? Causes versus solutions?
The closing down of national economies applied Worldwide will inevitably result in poverty, mass unemployment and an increase in mortality. It’s an act of economic warfare. It’s an unspoken crime against humanity.
It’s April 23rd, nearly four months since the government and major medical institutions knew (or should have known) about the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic. Canada responded much like other countries, we don’t have the highest numbers of confirmed cases or deaths, but we are affected, nevertheless. Living in Dundas as a senior citizen with heart condition and diabetes, I would like to share with you some of my observations and suggestions.
A baby resident of Dundas Valley – (click on image to see its full size) – photo: author
As the winter approaches and soon we will see, again, closed trails and native hunters roaming our conservation area based on a fraudulent “treaty rights” claim, here is a reminder of the work that was done on this topic by a group of researchers who oppose the annual hunt: