Online Skirmishes

I am sure you all have experienced them. Sometimes, they are real trolls and sometimes they are just misinformed and scared individuals who seek the truth or run away from it. You post something online and somebody confronts you for exercising your freedom of speech. This has just happen to me earlier today. I got an email from a retired medical doctor living in one of Southern Ontario cities. The following conversation resulted:

He: Please remove this post. It is full of disinformation about COVID-19

I: This is your opinion and you are entitled to have one. Do you have any facts to support it? We now have a “wave” of ‘trolls’ telling other people what to think and what not to think, what to share with others and what not to share, so it becomes increasingly difficult to engage in a meaningful and substantive debate. I grew up in a communist system, so I know where it comes from. I do have the facts supporting the article in question. 

Moreover, credible doctors know the truth about this “pandemic”. Actually, you don’t have to be a doctor to think independently and to see what is going on (or not going on) around you, especially if you have a background in science, reasonable research skills, and friends who work at the hospitals. Analyzing and verifying statistical data is also helpful in discovering the true picture.
As to the facts presented in the article, they were officially published in reputable medical journals. For example, the fact that the Chinese virologist in charge of coronavirus research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Shi Zhengli (the “Bat Woman”), was one of the 15 scientists who in person participated in the “Gain of Function” research and published the “Gain of Function” study paper. This research was originally conducted at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, under the direction of Ralph Baric. The research was later moved to the Wuhan lab (China), after it was banned in the US (the moratorium). It was financed through American entities. The long history of collaboration between Shi Zhengli and Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance  is also well documented. Just recently, Dr. David Martin, in his deposition for Reiner Fuelmich and the Coronavirus Investigating Committee, provided concrete evidence that the research and associated patents go back to the year 2000. All this information is included in the blog and I encourage you to take some time out of your busy schedule to read about it. 

Please remember that we are now living in times, when personal honesty becomes more important and credible than professional credentials. Even today, I still see many doctors and specialists who enforce the fear campaign based on false statistics and media disinformation, and encourage their patients to take the experimental so-called “vaccines” that don’t protect from infection or transmission and have already shown some serious adverse effects. There are many different aspects of this topic but I will leave it here. I will grant you the benefit of doubt and suppose that you are doing what you think is right in a broader public interest. So do I.

He: David Martin is not a medical doctor. He is not credible.

I: Oh, c’mon. I did not say that he was a “medical doctor”, I know who he is. In his line of business, he is very credible and his data is easily verifiable.
Besides, who said that medical doctors are the most intelligent, knowledgeable, honest and credible people in this world? 

He: Reality – [ Link ]

I: I am sure you also believe in the WMD story that served as a pretext for the war on Iraq and that we sent our soldiers to Afghanistan to help the poor Afghani women get education. Dr. Martin’s deposition on patents related to SARS-Cov-2, RT-PCR tests and sequences included in mRNA vaccines can be easily verified, so there is no room for “conspiracy theory” there. It looks like a real conspiracy to me. I am aware of the efforts to discredit alternative narratives about this so-called “pandemic” but I am not a sheep, so please don’t send me any media propaganda posing as a “credible evidence” or a “fact check”. Facts are in dr. Martin’s deposition. The reaction to it demonstrates that it seriously scared many of the conspirators. 

This entry was posted in "Pandemic", Censorship. Bookmark the permalink.