Related:
Comment: I would gladly agree with Mark Carney if his plan was not grounded in false and misleading propaganda and Europe’s aggressive desire to attack and destroy Russia. Provocations and attacks on Russia began in 1991 (after the collapse of Soviet Union) and (so far) consisted of seven phases:
- Initial attempt to rob Russia of its natural resources (Yeltsin era);
- Color revolutions and wars for energy resources and pipeline corridors in order to sabotage and replace Russia’s energy exports to Europe;
- Eastward expansion of NATO (contrary to promises given in 1990) and provocative NATO military exercises on Russia’s borders;
- Unprecedented Russophobia (irrational fear, hatred, or prejudice directed at Russia) promoted in eastern Europe and on international arena;
- Kyiv’s Maidan (2014) and an attempt to admit Ukraine and Georgia to NATO;
- Hot war between NATO and Russia in Ukraine;
- Escalation of war to Finland and Baltic States.
If Mark Carney is conveniently forgetting about these historical facts, he is either incompetent or dishonest. Furthermore, Carney’s remarks about the Arctic are unclear to me. Continental shelves, territorial waters, and Exclusive Economic Zones in the Arctic are clearly defined by international law and are not being contested by Russia. They are being contested by the U.S.A. and Trump’s claims to Canada and Greenland. If Carney is trying to militarize Canadian Arctic to protect it from the U.S., he should say so instead of hiding this topic in the context of alleged threats from Russia. If he is trying to militarize Canadian Arctic in order to challenge Russia and take over Russia’s resources, then he is an aggressor and war criminal. This could explain his improving relations with aggressive European NATO states as well as his globalist career path. Carney, the globalist, should not paint his plans as serving Canada’s national interest, either. This would be a hypocrisy. You are either a globalist or you are a nationalist but you cannot have it both ways at the same time. Carney, the Prime Minister, should know better than that. My opinion.
In response to a couple of questions:
Yes, Carney is a globalist. This is why he is fighting Trump’s MAGA and Trump’s nationalistic policies. This is also why he supports Europe in its aggression on Russia’s national government that is leading the multipolar world offensive. On the other hand, Carney’s government is very polite to China and Chinese expansion. China is a hub of globalism today. As a result of offshoring, China became the world’s factory and it needs access to global markets. Therefore, China’s relationship with Russia must be purely opportunistic and tactical rather than strategic. China needs Russia’s resources but China does not need Russia. This may be the reason why Putin is avoiding direct confrontation with NATO. It’s all connected.
My Dundas Valley 