Related:
- Former PM Harper speaks at investment summit
- ‘They Will Let You…’: Mark Carney Mocks Trump’s Canada Relationship With One Brutal Joke
- Ottawa’s Quiet Embrace of the Chinese Regime Is Alarming – Peter Menzies
- Michael Parenti Terrorism Globalism and Conspiracy – (Vancouver, BC, 2002)
- New World Order and Education – (Hamilton, ON, 2007)
Comment: This is a tough one. On one hand, Carney is being positioned and promoted as a professional national hero who dodged Trump’s punches and delivered some punches himself. On the other hand, he is talking about the implementation of a “new economic order” globally, with Canada playing a leading role in the process. This sounds like the Great Reset / the Fourth and Fifth Industrial Revolutions in which the World Economic Forum (WEF) is deeply engaged. This sounds like the New World Order of which the “elites” have been talking since 1990s. It moves us into the realm leading to one world government using integration of national economies into one global economy as a first step. It seems that this is what Carney is talking about, which makes him an extension of Justin Trudeau’s policies, extension added and arranged as a result of Trudeau’s blunders and falling popularity. For all patriots who support protection of our national identity, our heritage, culture, and traditions, including our own national wealth and material base created by generations of hard working Canadians, this would mean giving away some of the fruits of our labor and all of our social cohesion based on a common value system that we, as Canadians, share.
Canada Investment Summit brings more concerns than just national, cultural and material uncertainty. In all efforts to attract foreign investment, there are always present some “strings” that are attached to the deals. There is always pressure on the government to accept some expectations and conditions that compromise national interests. The China-influenced Epoch Times has recently published an article, As Ottawa Woos Business With New Reforms, Observers Question the State’s Continued Hand in the Economy. They do not mention other observers who support government rules as the only way to provide consumer protection from predatory capitalism. This is what we, The People, need governments for, this is what we elect them for. We have already heard of more privatization, private-public partnerships, more tax breaks for corporations and investors, selling out of our national assets, deregulation of markets, and less government oversight. We are witnessing unprecedented price gouging that has already reached its acceptable limits. Carney has recently said that switching to the new economic order will require more “sacrifices” – there is no room left for more sacrifices, Mr. Pro, unless your goal is to destroy the economy and pauperize the society. Isn’t this what Bilderbergers are also bragging about?
This is worrying me, as it always leads to corporate rule, monopolization, price gouging, loopholes for corporations, increased taxes for individual citizens, more cuts in education, health care, and social programs, and political corruption. This means the end of consumer protection in particular and many rights of the voters and taxpayers in general, which translates as the end of democracy. We already see such symptoms in relations between the corporate world and The People. We already see the investors enriching themselves at the expense of the population, hiding behind the AI assistants, and making it impossible to contact them directly.
Carney does not seem to notice the unprecedented price increases for essential goods and services that have already taken place under the excuse of the “pandemic” and now the war with Iran, even though Canada has never imported any significant amount of energy resources from Iran and the Persian Gulf. Carney is openly supporting Ukraine in its war with Russia, which shows that he is either incompetent or dishonest about the origins of this war and the fact that Russia was provoked by NATO, not the other way around. Also, the war in Ukraine did not affect our imports of energy resources, even though the official media tried to falsely suggest that.
In his efforts to tighten close relationship with Europe, Carney appears to support Europe’s preparations for war and desire to attack Russia. Europe is also inviting Canada to take an active role in the European Block – (Carney Tells European Parliament Canada Welcomes ‘Associate Member’ Proposal). At this time, it looks like Canada is being lured to take part in the war with Russia. Carney did not have this item in his election campaign or in the Liberal program. He does not have a mandate to make such a choice. Neither does the Liberal Party of Canada. This means that he will illegally send our soldiers to the Ukrainian grinder, if Europe declares such a war. He may do it under Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty (NATO), even though it does not apply to Ukraine which is not a member of NATO. This will make us an aggressor and will trigger a military response by Russia and its allies. Escalation will be impossible to avoid and will, most likely, include the use or nuclear weapons.
Carneys argument is, “This will be good for the economy”. Well, car accidents are also good for the economy. They create jobs – police, emergency departments, hospitals, doctors, lawyers, judges, courts, insurance companies, towing services, auto wreckers, repair shops, auto sales – and the list goes on. There are many things that might be good for the economy but are bad for human beings. – (Argument once used by Michael Parenti – 31:12).
I did not vote for Liberals, as it was obvious to me that the last election was carefully arranged to repair the damage done by Justin and his team but not to change the globalist policies of the Liberal Party. This whole trade war with Trump may be real or it may be a script and opportunity that justifies implementation of the “new global economic order” (that otherwise would cause wide spread protests). I cannot go any further with my conclusions but I will wait for political initiatives that prove my suspicions wrong or right. One way or the other, I am careful, when I see another “WEF contributor” taking on the role of a leader of economic and political changes in any of the western countries. My opinion. We have already seen them in Canada, in the UK, France, Australia, and New Zealand. Now, we see them in Germany. Nothing good came out of their policies, so far.






