Related:
Comment: Obviously, if you are attacked with arms, you should have the right to use arms to defend yourself. Otherwise, self-defence is not possible. This, however, does not include the original aggressor. For example, how can the occupier invoke self-defence, if the occupation itself is an aggression?
Comment: “Nation State”? Obviously it’s Israel. In 2018 Knesset approved the “Israel: Basic Law Nation State” legislation (constitutionally legalized apartheid). The language and the title of this resolution are clear. There is only one “nation state” on this globe.
Related:
Related:
Comment: In general, I am very suspicious of all trends that were promoted since the time the idea of depopulation was officially introduced. Selection of promoted ideas as well as financing of related studies and projects have always been done by the owners of media, the wealthy corporate interests, and certain political or ideological influencers. This became “openly” visible during the so-called pandemic.
Also, please don’t assume that all food producers only dream of their products becoming healthier. If you are a CEO responsible for increasing profits of the shareholders, your priority (and responsibility) is to increase the sales, increase the prices, and to lower the cost (read: quality). You will feed chicken and other farm animals steroids, so that they grow faster and bigger – (who cares that girls who eat these chickens will grow big bodies). That’s the problem. The state should have regulations to prevent it from happening, to provide consumer protection. For this to be possible, we have to outlaw political donations. Every political party should have a certain amount of free time on public television to run their campaigns and every politician who breaks their campaign promisses should be authomatically recalled by a special tribunal. Here, I’ve said it!
Related:
Related:
Comment 1: The “free speech vs. hate speech” mantra is unenforceable unless we clearly define what is hate speech. Lack of such definition makes the whole idea a complete nonsense. For example, hate speech is closer to discrimination based on who you are, as opposed to what you do. Criticizing people or a state for what they do is closer to justice. If I criticize the State of Israel, its leaders, and, by extension, its voters for the crime of genocide and ethnic cleansing in Palestine, is it a hate speech? How about criticizing Nazi Germany and Adolf Hitler for the crime of Holocaust? Will this be illegal, too? How about criticizing repeated violations of international law (Geneva Conventions and UN resolutions pertaining to the illegal occupation and annexation of Palestinian territories)? Will the UN be punished for issuing these resolutions? This whole topic is a manipulation of language to silence a legitimate critique of people and states who do wrong.
Comment 2: This is actually very simple, we have learned about it in grade 9 and 10. Electrical current always produces magnetic field around it and magnetic field always produces or interferes with electrical currents. Best examples are electric motors and generators. What are “induction currents”? They are created by other electrical currents that produce magnetic fields that, in turn, induce or modify electricity in another circuit. Now imagine tiny electric currents that our nerves conduct to regulate different functions of our bodies. Tiny electrochemical signals. And then imagine huge military radars that can detect a launch of ballistic missiles on another continent. Of course, this radar will interfere with our bodily functions and our health. We live in a jungle of electromagnetic fields that surround us 24/7.
“There is a campaign under way to essentially destroy the public education system along with every aspect of human life and attitudes and thought that involve social solidarity. It’s being done in all sorts of ways. One is simply by underfunding. So, if you can make the public schools really rotten, people will look for an alternative. Any service that’s going to be privatized, the first thing you do is make it malfunction so people can say, “We want to get rid of it. It’s not running. Let’s give it to Lockheed.” — Noam Chomsky, The Progressive Magazine, September 1999, p.37
“To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas.” - Brock Chisholm, Director UN World Health Organization (1948-53).
