It was important to us at Police on Guard for Thee to develop a mission statement that focuses on what is important. We want to give our supporters a clear understanding of our goals and values. Thank you for your continued support.

[ Source ]
It was important to us at Police on Guard for Thee to develop a mission statement that focuses on what is important. We want to give our supporters a clear understanding of our goals and values. Thank you for your continued support.

[ Source ]
Major Announcement: “Yesterday I sued the Attorney General of Ontario to defend our Constitutional Rights to protest, pray & assemble outdoors. The risk of outdoor transmission is exceedingly low, but the Government’s outdoor restrictions deny Ontarians our most precious Fundamental Freedoms.”
Link to this video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/hfzL5gUeQvxr/

Anthony Furey
Toronto Sun, Mar 22, 2021
A Canadian immunologist who conducts research into COVID-19 says that Ontario’s child-quarantine policies aren’t based on science and that his family’s not going to be fully following them.
Byram Bridle, an associate professor of viral immunology at the University of Guelph, fired off an open letter over the weekend to public health officials, politicians and media after being instructed to isolate his son alone for two weeks because a student in his class tested positive for the virus.
“I am a viral immunologist who conducts COVID-19 research, so I am speaking from an incredibly well-informed position,” the letter states. “I am also a parent. From both perspectives, these policies for children who have had a classmate test positive for COVID-19 are nothing short of abusive.”
Bridle attached a copy of the letter his household received from Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Public Health, which instructed them to have their child “isolate in a separate room” for 14 days and to keep a distance of two metres from other family members.
Bridle’s son has Down syndrome and there were no separate guidelines sent out concerning children with special needs.
Fully referenced facts about covid-19, provided by experts in the field, to help our readers make a realistic risk assessment.

Global Research, March 25, 2021
Swiss Policy Research,1 March 2021

By Prof. Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, March 26, 2021
The Real Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) test was adopted by the WHO on January 23, 2020 as a means to detecting the SARS-COV-2 virus, following the recommendations of a Virology research group (based at Charité University Hospital, Berlin), supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (For Further details see the Drosten Study)
Exactly one year later on January 20th, 2021, the WHO retracts. They don’t say “We Made a Mistake”. The retraction is carefully formulated.
While the WHO does not deny the validity of their misleading January 2020 guidelines, they nonetheless recommend “Re-testing” (which everybody knows is an impossibility).
Comment: The cause of the decline of the number of cases as of January is not a mystery. In January, WHO has published new recommendations , [ 2 ] for the procedure of PCR testing. This included limiting the Cycle Threshold (Ct) to max 25-30 cycles of amplification and the requirement that the test alone is not used for diagnosis without other clinical observations. If a country applied these new recommendations, the number of cases dropped because the number of false positives dramatically declined. Unfortunately, not all countries applied the new WHO recommendations and these are the countries which support the New Order and the Great Reset, political goals that have nothing in common with public health.
Comment: I will repeat what I had already said: I don’t believe that the police officers are stupid. They are intelligent people who can do research and can think independently. They know what is going on, they know what this “pandemic” is being used for. To introduce totalitarian police state, communist rule of leftist governments, so called New Order and Great Reset. I don’t understand why they are protecting the creation of this Orwellian world. Are they robots? Are they like the BORG? What kind of life are they preparing for their loved ones, their friends, their children and grandchildren? Why are they doing this? Is the job so important, is it worth enslaving their children and destroying Canada?
[ Source ]
[ Source ]
The law is the law and you do not have to reveal the reason or the details of your health condition. This is a personal and confidential information between you and your doctor and it is protected by privacy laws. But the law alone would not be reasonable and completed without a scientific and factual justification. It would be good for everybody (the courts included) to educate themselves about the issues involved in such cases. Many expert opinions are available and the opinions are divided. Ignoring half of these opinions may only mean one of three things: incompetence and ignorance, fear that replaces knowledge and reason, or an active role in implementing the New Order that uses this “pandemic” as a justification.