These are all vaccinated people, or else, they would not be allowed on the plane. Note that all of them are wearing masks. All believe that the C-19 vaccines are not effective. As does the airline, its management and the governments that promote this nonsense.
Comment: IN MY HUMBLE OPINION, CNN has a long history of misinformation. 9/11, the war(s) on terror, the policies and war crimes of Israel, now the “pandemic” and the vaccines. When this is over, CNN needs to be closed and replaced by a more reliable and more objective news and opinion outlet. We need the People’s Reset.
Simone Gold quotes Nikita Khrushchev on how to take over America without firing a single shot. It requires collapsing a society in four stages:
A fragment of 1984 interview with Juri Bezmenov, a Soviet KGB defector, who lists four stages of designed by the KGB ideological subversion of targeted countries:
Sounds familiar? Doesn’t it tell us who all these “schmucks” behind the fake pandemic really are? Add to it the “experimental” vaccines and their long-standing (since 1974 “Memorandum 200”) depopulation agenda and ask yourself one important question:
How can somebody like Bill Gates , [2] , [3] simultaneously promote depopulation and at the same time sponsor vaccines to allegedly save more lives? These are contradictory agendas. It’s either one or the other. You cannot have it both ways. And we still believe these people? Now we know why they needed to reform our education system, a process that began in Ontario in 1997. Today, many of us cannot use our brains independently, cannot connect the dots or think logically. For information, we depend on the TV, on mainstream media, even on video games and cartoons. We were conditioned to be inactive and not creative since childhood. We were conditioned to react on impulse, to use emotions instead of rational thinking and substantive arguments. We were conditioned to rely on “sources”. Like parrots, we repeat and copy what the “sources” say – and we stop thinking. Exactly what the plan has always been. Wake up, people!!
I am beginning to change my opinion about my former Board. Better late than never! But “late” may not be enough for the bureaucrats who took the health of their employees in their hands and figure skated around the law.
Forcing the staff to frequently undergo the “rapid” test is also illegal. In addition, the Abbott rapid test has been proven unreliable.
Besides, will the Board compensate the 93% of vaccinated staff, if any of them suffer loss of health and/or life as a result of being coerced by the Board to take the experimental vaccine as a condition of employment? The information about mRNA vaccines’ adverse effects was known and available in public domain at the time the Board was implementing and executing this policy, so there is no excuse for the members of the Board that they did not know about the risks involved. That was a very risky policy and the policy makers at the HWDSB better be prepared for serious, personal lawsuits.
In addition, is this Board still promoting vaccination of students entrusted to them by the parents, the voters, and the taxpayers?
Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Pfizer vice president
Comment: Laura-Lynn is not allowed to attend the restaurants, movie theaters, and other public establishments or events, because “she is not being obedient to the collective”. This statement does not make sense, even assuming that the “pandemic” is real. Obedient to which collective? The one that believes in the “pandemic” and is “fully vaccinated”, or the one that does not believe in it and refuses injection with an experimental substance called “vaccine”?
Why this does not make sense? Because it proves that the vaccines don’t work. Otherwise those vaccinated would have no reason to worry and be concerned. And if the vaccines don’t work, if they are not effective, (which has already been proven), then why are people forced to accept and to take them? Why are effective meds and treatment protocols banned? Doesn’t it show that there is another agenda behind it, one that has little to do with public health? One that is illegal in light of Canadian Constitution and Canadian laws? One that is actually criminal, given the number of under-reported and silenced adverse effects?
I just would like to draw your attention to one contributing factor in recent death statistics: For twenty months, we have been exercising the social isolation measures – the quarantines, the masking, the distancing. This is affecting and destroying our herd immunity. This is weakening our cross-immunity. Immunity needs to be practiced, needs to be constantly updated. “If you don’t use it, you lose it”, like everything else that you have neglected for a long time.
An independent Israeli group of physicians, lawyers, scientists, and researchers called the Professional Ethics Front today advised the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding the upcoming FDA discussion on administering COVID-19 vaccines to children aged 5-11, expressing “severe concerns” regarding the reliability and legality of official Israeli COVID vaccine data.
Continue readingGood sound and main part of this video presentation begins at mark 00:05:30
Investigative Report on the COVID-19 Pandemic and its Relationship to SARS-CoV-2 and other Factors (by: Association of French Reserve Army Officers) 13-May-2020
Comment: I could not verify the authenticity of some of the facts included in the “Investigative Report”. However, I am passing it to you AS IS, knowing that if these facts are true, you should be aware of them.
Related:
Well, saying that the unvaccinated threaten the vaccinated proves that the vaccines are not effective. that they don’t work. You cannot have it both ways.
[Source] Comment:
Limitations of techniques used to screen people (in Canada)
The Quarantine Act (S.C. 2005, c. 20):
4. Purpose – The purpose of this Act is to protect public health by taking comprehensive measures to prevent the introduction and spread of communicable diseases.
5 (1) Designating analysts and certain officers – The Minister may designate qualified persons, or classes of qualified persons, as analysts, screening officers or environmental health officers.
14 (1) Screening technology – Any qualified person authorized by the Minister may, to determine whether a traveller has a communicable disease or symptoms of one, use any screening technology authorized by the Minister that does not involve the entry into the traveller’s body of any instrument or other foreign body.
The Canadian Quarantine Act serves the same purpose as the restrictions and measures introduced by the governments to combat the Covid-19 pandemic, namely, to protect public health by taking comprehensive measures to prevent the introduction and spread of communicable diseases. It seems only reasonable to conclude that the measures applied by our governments to combat the Covid-19 pandemic are (or ought to be) subject to the same limitations as those listed in Point 14 (1) of the Quarantine Act. The use any screening technology authorized by the Minister must not involve the entry into the tested person’s body of any instrument or other foreign body. This limitation and restriction is not being observed in screening with the RT-PCR test.
The collection of cells from the back of the pharynx, approached through the nose or mouth, must be performed by a specialized and trained caregiver. It is NOT PAINLESS! This sample may cause bleeding, damage to the pharyngeal (surface) mucous membrane, and/or the nasal mucous membrane if approached through the nose. [Source]
This is a risky technique, as it may cause injury. I was tested with the RT-PCR technology twice. After the second test, my nasal mucous membrane was injured and I was bleeding from my nose for three days. The healing was probably prolonged by the blood thinner injections that I was receiving at the hospital to lower the risk of a heart failure.
Regardless of the risks involved, the RT-PCR test should not be authorized (or mandatory), because it involves the entry and penetration of the tested person’s body with the swab – in order to collect the sample. By extension, injection of a vaccine also constitutes entry into the person’s body of an instrument and other foreign body (the actual mRNA “soup”). Vaccines serve the same purpose as quarantine, namely, they protect public health and prevent the spread of communicable diseases. Therefore, they should be subject to the same limitations.
Individual Rights vs. Collective Rights
Limitations of individual human rights and implementation of measures that, in some cases, are unhealthy and degrading, (for example the requirement to wear masks), are being justified by necessity to protect collective public safety, health, and morals. Measures applied by the governments and corporations suggest that collective safety is more important than individual rights and freedoms. However, in case of a pandemic, this priority is not consistent with international law:
UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights:
Article 3 – Human dignity and human rights
1. Human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms are to be fully respected.
2. The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society.
I could not say it better.
“There is a campaign under way to essentially destroy the public education system along with every aspect of human life and attitudes and thought that involve social solidarity. It’s being done in all sorts of ways. One is simply by underfunding. So, if you can make the public schools really rotten, people will look for an alternative. Any service that’s going to be privatized, the first thing you do is make it malfunction so people can say, “We want to get rid of it. It’s not running. Let’s give it to Lockheed.” — Noam Chomsky, The Progressive Magazine, September 1999, p.37
“To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas.” - Brock Chisholm, Director UN World Health Organization (1948-53).
